Superior vena cava syndrome in chronic intestinal failure patients: When the going gets tough.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Catheter-related venous thrombosis is a severe complication of home parenteral nutrition (HPN) with potentially devastating consequences such as superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS). Early recognition and awareness of factors leading to its development are of paramount importance. However, studies are lacking in HPN patients focusing on this topic. In this study, we aimed to determine the incidence of SVCS in HPN patients and describe SVCS-related outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study comprised all adult HPN patients who developed SVCS between 2000 and 2022 at our national HPN referral center. Primary outcome was the incidence of SVCS. Secondary outcomes include SVCS-related symptoms, tip location of central venous access device (CVAD) post-insertion and at time of SVCS, diagnostics and treatment. RESULTS: SVCS was diagnosed in 38 of 616 patients (6%), with an annual cumulative incidence rate ranging between 0 and 4.2%. Most common presenting symptoms were facial edema (82%) and arm edema (50%). Post-insertion, 17% (6/36) of patients had a correct position of the CVAD tip and 11% (4/36) during SVCS diagnosis. Computed tomography was the most used diagnostic imaging technique (66%). Sixty-three percent of patients started, 11% switched, and 21% continued anticoagulant treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of SVCS is relatively high in our vulnerable HPN population. It is key to recognize whenever such patients present with vascular obstruction-related symptoms and treat them in an early stage by a multidisciplinary team.

Taurolidine-related adverse events in patients on home parenteral nutrition frequently indicate catheter-related problems.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: A catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) is a serious complication of home parenteral nutrition (HPN) treatment. Despite taurolidine's frequent use as catheter lock solution (CLS) to prevent CRBSIs and its presumed favourable safety profile, data on taurolidine-related adverse events (AEs) and the clinical implications thereof remain merely anecdotal. Aim of this study was to explore taurolidine-related AEs in our large cohort of HPN patients and to develop an algorithm on how to deal with these AEs in clinical practice. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study comprised all adult HPN patients who used taurolidine as a CLS between 2006 and 2021 at our national HPN referral centre. Primary outcome was to identify taurolidine-related AEs. Secondary outcomes were median time to a taurolidine-related AEs and development of a clinical algorithm. A taurolidine-related AE was defined as an event that occurred directly after instillation of taurolidine in the CVAD or at start of fluid/PN infusion. RESULTS: In total, 470 patients used taurolidine during 700.232 catheter days. In 89 (19%) patients, 103 mild- to severe AEs related to taurolidine were observed. Six patients developed an allergic reaction. Reported AEs compromised vascular access device-related problems (group A) or taurolidine-related problems (group B) in 53 (51%) and 50 (49%), patients, respectively. In groups A and B, 51 (85%) and 21 (18%) patients presented with taurolidine infusion-related pain. Upon rechallenge, 45 (85%) and 16 (32%) patients, respectively, successfully resumed taurolidine locking without residual symptoms. CONCLUSION: In this study, use of taurolidine as CLS was generally safe. Most reported AEs were vascular access device-related, and the majority of symptoms concerned pain. Upon rechallenge, a substantial number of patients, especially those in whom pain was the main symptom, could resume CLS locking after addressing the underlying catheter-related problem. Based on these results, we present a clinical algorithm for patients with possible taurolidine-related symptoms.